archive any thing can be done by weizima.
Tuesday, March 20, 2007
Saturday, March 17, 2007
design of GIF format image
Thursday, March 15, 2007
Tuesday, March 13, 2007
resist to change to simplified character
One upon a time , a man wrote an article about the Chinese character of "horse".
He liked the complex form because the character has 4 legs depicting a horse galloping
across the written page.
I wonder what if it is a horse lying down at rest under the banyan tree or simply
a DEAD horse. I rather take on a descriptive adjective as backing.
He liked the complex form because the character has 4 legs depicting a horse galloping
across the written page.
I wonder what if it is a horse lying down at rest under the banyan tree or simply
a DEAD horse. I rather take on a descriptive adjective as backing.
typing input system
The digitization of zi (Chinese character):
1249 for wood
331 for horse
272 for mountain
11 for two
111 for three .............etc Later a Chinese character will be attached.
weizima is also the input key-in system aside from being an indexing system .
1249 for wood
331 for horse
272 for mountain
11 for two
111 for three .............etc Later a Chinese character will be attached.
weizima is also the input key-in system aside from being an indexing system .
Sunday, March 11, 2007
counting from zero
Counting from 0,1,2,3.....9 because 0 is a number.
Don't count from 1,2,3......10 . Since childhood,we were taught to count from 1.
In the library classification system :
1/ the people's university system (in many places there is confusion )
2/ the Chinese academy of science system dated 1981 (vol-1,p157: in section 39.9/08.1,It is more clear to say 39.90081.Though they count from zero but inefficient use of zero).
Also section 36/01-08.1: it should be 36.001 to 36.0081
Don't count from 1,2,3......10 . Since childhood,we were taught to count from 1.
In the library classification system :
1/ the people's university system (in many places there is confusion )
2/ the Chinese academy of science system dated 1981 (vol-1,p157: in section 39.9/08.1,It is more clear to say 39.90081.Though they count from zero but inefficient use of zero).
Also section 36/01-08.1: it should be 36.001 to 36.0081
Saturday, March 10, 2007
Thursday, March 8, 2007
Wednesday, March 7, 2007
Sunday, March 4, 2007
Surname index
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)