Tuesday, March 20, 2007
Saturday, March 17, 2007
design of GIF format image
Thursday, March 15, 2007
Tuesday, March 13, 2007
resist to change to simplified character
One upon a time , a man wrote an article about the Chinese character of "horse".
He liked the complex form because the character has 4 legs depicting a horse galloping
across the written page.
I wonder what if it is a horse lying down at rest under the banyan tree or simply
a DEAD horse. I rather take on a descriptive adjective as backing.
He liked the complex form because the character has 4 legs depicting a horse galloping
across the written page.
I wonder what if it is a horse lying down at rest under the banyan tree or simply
a DEAD horse. I rather take on a descriptive adjective as backing.
typing input system
The digitization of zi (Chinese character):
1249 for wood
331 for horse
272 for mountain
11 for two
111 for three .............etc Later a Chinese character will be attached.
weizima is also the input key-in system aside from being an indexing system .
1249 for wood
331 for horse
272 for mountain
11 for two
111 for three .............etc Later a Chinese character will be attached.
weizima is also the input key-in system aside from being an indexing system .
Sunday, March 11, 2007
counting from zero
Counting from 0,1,2,3.....9 because 0 is a number.
Don't count from 1,2,3......10 . Since childhood,we were taught to count from 1.
In the library classification system :
1/ the people's university system (in many places there is confusion )
2/ the Chinese academy of science system dated 1981 (vol-1,p157: in section 39.9/08.1,It is more clear to say 39.90081.Though they count from zero but inefficient use of zero).
Also section 36/01-08.1: it should be 36.001 to 36.0081
Don't count from 1,2,3......10 . Since childhood,we were taught to count from 1.
In the library classification system :
1/ the people's university system (in many places there is confusion )
2/ the Chinese academy of science system dated 1981 (vol-1,p157: in section 39.9/08.1,It is more clear to say 39.90081.Though they count from zero but inefficient use of zero).
Also section 36/01-08.1: it should be 36.001 to 36.0081
Saturday, March 10, 2007
Thursday, March 8, 2007
Wednesday, March 7, 2007
Sunday, March 4, 2007
Surname index
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)